When it comes to convincing experts (or in the case of politicians experts) you?ll want to bring out the big guns Vapers have a variety of major literature reviews that look at lots of evidence and conclude that vaping is much safer than smoking Here are some of the best:
After switching from tobacco to e-cigarettes nicotine exposure remains unchanged while exposure to selected carcinogens and toxicants is substantially reduced the authors wrote
We know how you feel You pick up a newspaper turn on the TV check into Facebook?you know what?s lurking just ahead Stories designed to scare everyone about vaping Every day it?s something new
There has been much discussion over the benefits of vaping over conventional smoking methods and this is the first long-term study assessing these effects In general the findings have been reported accurately in the UK media; however none of the limitations as described by the researchers themselves have been mentioned
You need ammunition to fight back Most of those stories are based on a single poorly done study that proves nothing What if you had serious robust studies about every anti-vaping talking point that you could use to answer Aunt Ruth?
After the infamous letter to the New England Journal of Medicine claiming high formaldehyde in vapor Dr Farsalinos did experiments to show that formaldehyde is only produced when an atomizer is overheated and the user gets a horrible dry hit