The main findings are not that surprising ? former smokers who have now switched to using e-cigarettes or NRT only have significantly lower levels of toxins than those who continue to smoke regular cigarettes
For a trustworthy overview of vaping this article is definitely one to consult It refers to a range of studies from reputable sources such as Public Health England and is unbiased in its approach It also directs the reader to resources to help them stop smoking and clearly states that ?there?s still as big misconception that e-cigarettes are as harmful as smoking?
Those who have carefully considered all of the medical evidence ? Public Health England and the Royal College of Physicians ? have concluded that the potential of serious vaping danger is probably very low The RCP says vaping is unlikely to exceed five percent of the harm from smoking tobacco
Fake news is usually written in a way that deliberately avoids explicitly defining the finer details of the topic of the article For example The Ashtray Blog points to an article on the prevalence of dripping amongst teenagers which not only used false figures but also did ?everything they could to make dripping sound like a form of drug abuse [whilst] every piece of coverage did a monumentally awful job of explaining what dripping actually is? This type of evasion is typical of biased reporting which tries its best to avoid facts and figures that don?t support the view it?s trying to put forward Another typical tactic is using evasive language to say something without explicitly stating it eg using words such as ?could?
This study provides evidence that e-cigarettes and NRT can reduce harm to smokers by reducing exposure to toxic chemicals The evidence would also seem to support Public Health England?s 2015 report that E-cigarettes are 95% less harmful than tobacco
After switching from tobacco to e-cigarettes nicotine exposure remains unchanged while exposure to selected carcinogens and toxicants is substantially reduced the authors wrote